Thursday, May 14, 2009
Warren Buffet-at a glance
Friday, March 20, 2009
Mr.Jhunjhunwala- the Pied Piper of Indian bourses
Rakesh Jhunjhunwala is a Chartered Accountant by qualification but an investor / trader by profession. He is one of the most famous and respected equity investors in India and manages his own portfolio as a partner in his asset management firm, Rare Enterprises. He is tagged by the media as 'India's Warren Buffet' .For a man who purchased Tata Tea for Rs 5000 when he was only fifteen years old, Rakesh Jhunjhunwala has a total networth of ap-proximately Rs 6000 crore along with his wife Rekha Jhunjhunwala. Mr Jhunjhunwala is a canny stock picker for long term investment and reputed for his eye on macroeconomics. Much like Mr Warren Buffet, he buys into the business model of a company and for judging the longevity and growth potential, he gives top priority to 'competitive ability', 'scalability' and 'management quality' of the enterprise. According to Mr Jhunjhunwala, believing in the vision and the beliefs of the entrepreneur and validating the risks that may not be perceived by the entrepreneur are the key success factors for an investor. The typical traits to look for while identifying potential multi-baggers are - low institutional holding, under-researched and general pessimism about the stock.
Mr Jhunjhunwala has managed to identify numerous multi-baggers in the past decade, notable being Praj Industries, Crisil, Titan, Nagarjuna and PSUs like BEML and Bharat Electronics, among others. He says -A good time to sell a stock is not based on any 'price' targets, but when the 'earnings' expectations have peaked or the business model has peaked or the valuations appear ridiculously unreasonable.
Look out for “What is the Big Man bullish on?” at http://www.theequitydesk.com/rakesh_jhunjhunwala.asp
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Are toxic assets really toxic?

Accountants record. They don’t analyze. There isn’t a right number and a wrong number. There are just useful numbers and useless numbers. In her book Dear Mr. Buffett, Janet Tavakoli quotes an email from Warren Buffett:
“I’ve looked at the prospectuses, and they are not easy to read. If you want to understand the deal you’d have to read around 750,000 pages of documents.”
A lot of people make the argument that these assets are not toxic at some prices. Theoretically, that’s true. If there’s value in an asset – at some deep discount to par – a high-risk asset can become a low-risk investment.These toxic assets are “meta-bets”. A low price is little help if there is inadequate cash flow or collateral built into the asset. A low price can’t fix an inherent flaw in an asset. If the cash flow generating potential of the asset is almost non-existent, the asset is essentially worthless.A lot of these toxic assets were similarly structured. They were built to fail.A bad house is a good value at some price. A risky mortgage is a good value at some price. But “meta-bets” are trickier. They can suffer from the same sort of problem Buffett described with the very worst junk bonds – you can actually take a good asset, with good cash flows and then put so much debt on top of it that the only way you can fix the problem is by restructuring the debt. In such cases, a low price is no longer enough. The terms are the problem.

